President BBM’s recent proposition to return to a previous system for handling right-of-way issues, where the government would pay only 15 percent of the property value upfront and resolve any subsequent valuation disputes in court, has significant implications not only for landowners but also for the general public.
Key infrastructure flagship projects currently facing right of way (ROW) issues include the Cagayan de Oro Diversion Road Extension, the Davao City Bypass Construction Project, the Samal Island-Davao City Connector Bridge, the Light Rail Transit-1 Cavite Extension Project, and the EDSA Greenways Project.
One of the primary motivations behind President BBM’s proposal is to expedite infrastructure projects. Projects could proceed without delay by taking possession of the property with an initial 15 percent payment and allowing valuation disputes to be settled later. This could lead to quicker completion of essential infrastructure such as roads, bridges, and public utilities, benefiting the public by improving transportation, connectivity, and access to services.
However, this expedited process might come at a cost. The reliance on courts to resolve valuation disputes can increase the judicial system’s burden, potentially causing delays in other legal proceedings. Additionally, the cost of prolonged litigation could ultimately be borne by taxpayers, increasing public expenditure.
The public perception of the government’s commitment to fair and just practices could be affected. If the policy unfairly favors infrastructure development at the expense of property owner’s rights, it could lead to public dissent and erode trust in government institutions. Ensuring a transparent and fair process is crucial for maintaining public confidence.
Efficient and timely infrastructure development can have positive economic impacts, such as stimulating investment, creating jobs, and boosting economic growth. Improved infrastructure enhances the overall business environment, making it easier for companies to operate and expand. However, if the process is perceived as unjust, it might deter investment, particularly in real estate and property development sectors, due to concerns about property rights and fair compensation.
The rapid acquisition of property for infrastructure projects can lead to community displacement. This has social implications, as displaced families and communities may face significant challenges in finding new homes, and jobs, and adjusting to new environments. Ensuring displaced individuals are adequately compensated and supported through the transition is essential to mitigate these impacts.
A system that prioritizes quick project completion over fair compensation may disproportionately affect vulnerable populations. Lower initial compensation could exacerbate the financial instability of low-income families and marginalized communities. Ensuring equitable treatment for all property owners, regardless of their socio-economic status, is critical for social justice.
Therefore, President BBM’s proposal to modify the right-of-way process has the potential to accelerate infrastructure development, benefiting the public through improved services and economic growth. However, it also raises significant concerns about legal and financial burdens, public trust, social impacts, and equity. A balanced approach that maintains fairness, transparency, and support for affected individuals is essential to ensure that the benefits of infrastructure projects are realized without compromising the rights and welfare of property owners and the broader community.
Real LexEcon 