Tag: news

BLGF Invites Prof. Agosto in RPVRA IRR Workshop

The Bureau of Local Government Finance (BLGF), a key agency responsible for overseeing local government revenue collection and fiscal policies, recently invited Gus Agosto, the President of the Society of Litigation Valuation Experts (SOLVE), to participate in a significant event aimed at shaping the future of property valuation in the Philippines. This event was the Workshop for the Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) of the Real Property Valuation and Reassessment Act (RPVRA), held from August 20 to 23, 2024 at Dusit Thani in Lapu-Lapu City, Cebu.

The workshop’s primary objective was to finalize the Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) for the RPVRA, a groundbreaking piece of legislation aimed at reforming real estate property valuation practices across the country. The RPVRA’s provisions are geared toward:

  • Standardizing real property valuation across Local Government Units (LGUs),
  • Strengthening the efficiency of property tax collection,
  • Enhancing transparency in government-led real estate transactions,
  • Establishing a National Valuation Database.

Given the far-reaching implications of the RPVRA, this workshop was crucial for ensuring that the IRR accurately reflected the spirit of the law while considering the practical realities of its implementation.

Prof. Gus Agosto, representing Group 1 in the discussions, played a central role in examining and debating key provisions of the RPVRA, particularly those affecting litigation-related valuation issues. His expertise as the President of SOLVE, an organization specializing in property valuation in legal disputes, added valuable insights into the drafting process. Group 1 likely focused on technical aspects of valuation practices, dispute resolution, and how to ensure the law’s provisions are consistently applied across regions.

His participation underscored the importance of collaboration between government bodies, private sector experts, and organizations such as SOLVE, as they worked to ensure that the IRR would be both legally sound and implementable at the local level.

The workshop was attended by a diverse group of stakeholders from the Visayas and Mindanao regions, representing both the public and private sectors:

  • Government Agencies:

    • Bureau of Local Government Finance (BLGF): Ensures local government revenue collection aligns with new valuation standards.

    • Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR): Guides interactions of RPVRA with tax administration.

    • Philippine Tax Academy: Supports training for assessors and tax officers.

    • Local Government Assessors: Implement new valuation standards at local levels.

    • Phividec Industrial Authority: Focuses on how the new valuation law affects industrial property valuations.


      Private Sector:


    • Real estate practitioners, property developers, and valuation experts shared insights on the law’s impact on real estate and investments.

During the workshop, various provisions of the RPVRA were debated, including:

  1. Valuation Standards:
    • Ensuring uniformity in real property valuation across all LGUs, addressing long-standing issues with inconsistent property assessments in different regions.
  2. Creation of the National Valuation Database:
    • Discussing the technical requirements, privacy concerns, and the operational framework of the database, which would be central to transparent and reliable valuation practices.
  3. Periodic Revaluation Requirements:
    • The IRR’s requirement for LGUs to conduct regular updates to property valuations would address the issue of outdated valuations that impact fair taxation and public transactions.
  4. Appraisers’ and Assessors’ Qualifications:
    • Emphasis was placed on professionalizing the appraisal practice through standardized training and certification programs, with contributions from the Philippine Tax Academy.
  5. Litigation-Related Provisions: Mr. Agosto’s involvement focused on mechanisms for resolving valuation disputes, particularly in cases of eminent domain, where the government acquires private property for public use, and determining just compensation becomes critical.

The workshop was pivotal for finalizing the IRR, which would serve as the guiding document for the implementation of the RPVRA across the country. This collaborative effort between the government and the private sector aims to ensure that real estate valuation practices in the Philippines align with international standards, promote transparency, and support the fair and equitable taxation of real properties.

The participation of key government bodies such as the BIR and the BLGF, alongside valuation experts like Gus Agosto, ensures that the IRR addresses both the technical and practical aspects of real estate property valuation, enhancing the law’s chances of being effectively implemented across the country’s LGUs.

On BBM’s Right of Way Policy Proposition

President BBM’s recent proposition to return to a previous system for handling right-of-way issues, where the government would pay only 15 percent of the property value upfront and resolve any subsequent valuation disputes in court, has significant implications not only for landowners but also for the general public.

Key infrastructure flagship projects currently facing right of way (ROW) issues include the Cagayan de Oro Diversion Road Extension, the Davao City Bypass Construction Project, the Samal Island-Davao City Connector Bridge, the Light Rail Transit-1 Cavite Extension Project, and the EDSA Greenways Project.

One of the primary motivations behind President BBM’s proposal is to expedite infrastructure projects. Projects could proceed without delay by taking possession of the property with an initial 15 percent payment and allowing valuation disputes to be settled later. This could lead to quicker completion of essential infrastructure such as roads, bridges, and public utilities, benefiting the public by improving transportation, connectivity, and access to services.

However, this expedited process might come at a cost. The reliance on courts to resolve valuation disputes can increase the judicial system’s burden, potentially causing delays in other legal proceedings. Additionally, the cost of prolonged litigation could ultimately be borne by taxpayers, increasing public expenditure.

The public perception of the government’s commitment to fair and just practices could be affected. If the policy unfairly favors infrastructure development at the expense of property owner’s rights, it could lead to public dissent and erode trust in government institutions. Ensuring a transparent and fair process is crucial for maintaining public confidence.

Efficient and timely infrastructure development can have positive economic impacts, such as stimulating investment, creating jobs, and boosting economic growth. Improved infrastructure enhances the overall business environment, making it easier for companies to operate and expand. However, if the process is perceived as unjust, it might deter investment, particularly in real estate and property development sectors, due to concerns about property rights and fair compensation.

The rapid acquisition of property for infrastructure projects can lead to community displacement. This has social implications, as displaced families and communities may face significant challenges in finding new homes, and jobs, and adjusting to new environments. Ensuring displaced individuals are adequately compensated and supported through the transition is essential to mitigate these impacts.

A system that prioritizes quick project completion over fair compensation may disproportionately affect vulnerable populations. Lower initial compensation could exacerbate the financial instability of low-income families and marginalized communities. Ensuring equitable treatment for all property owners, regardless of their socio-economic status, is critical for social justice.

Therefore, President BBM’s proposal to modify the right-of-way process has the potential to accelerate infrastructure development, benefiting the public through improved services and economic growth. However, it also raises significant concerns about legal and financial burdens, public trust, social impacts, and equity. A balanced approach that maintains fairness, transparency, and support for affected individuals is essential to ensure that the benefits of infrastructure projects are realized without compromising the rights and welfare of property owners and the broader community.

AB Agosto was named to the Environmental Impact Assessment Review Committee

In a significant development, Gus Agosto has been listed as a member of the newly established Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Review Committee in Region 7. The EIA process, aimed at foreseeing the environmental impact of a development, involves the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). This document, submitted by the project proponent or EIA consultant, serves as the application for an environmental compliance certificate (ECC).

“I am deeply honored and humbled by the appointment to serve in the EIA Review Committee. The importance of responsible and sustainable development cannot be overstated, and I am committed to contributing my expertise to ensure that development projects in our region align with environmental standards,” commented the Environmental Planner.

The ECC is granted based on a comprehensive study of a project’s significant impacts on the environment and the proposed environmental management plan. Agosto’s role in the committee involves contributing to the thorough analysis required during the review of EIS. This analysis includes evaluating data accuracy, the soundness of analysis, and the appropriateness of proposed mitigation measures.

According to DENR Administrative Order 2003-30, the Environmental Management Bureau (EMB) is entrusted with implementing the Philippine Environmental Impact Statement System (PEISS). The EMB can commission independent professionals, academic experts, and representatives from relevant government agencies as members of the EIA Review Committee (EIARC).

The EIARC, a body of independent technical experts and professionals of known probity from various fields, evaluates EIA reports and provides recommendations on the issuance or non-issuance of an ECC. It plays a crucial role in ensuring the environmental sustainability of development projects.

Project proponents are mandated to secure an ECC before commencing any development initiative. The issuance of this certificate is contingent upon a positive review of the EIS by the EIARC, highlighting the significance of this committee in upholding environmental standards in development projects.

“I believe that fostering a balance between development and environmental preservation is crucial for the well-being of our communities,” Mr. Agosto concluded.